Tue, 22 September 2009
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen FordIsrael
reacted with typical feigned outrage at the United Nations report on
war crimes and human rights violations committed by its forces in Gaza,
last winter. The Jewish state's serial violations of international law
are rooted in the barbarism of its governing principle, apartheid,
which leads Israel to place itself “above the accepted norms of
civilized behavior.”
Apartheid is the Root of Israel’s Aggressions
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
“Underlying Israeli lawlessness is the concept of a settler state constructed for the benefit of one ethnic group.”
The
State of Israel, by far the world champion violator of international
law as interpreted by the United Nations, is once again raining vitriol
and insult on the world body that gave it birth 61 years ago. Since
almost the day that the U.N. recognized the Jewish state in 1948,
Israel has placed itself above the accepted norms of civilized
behavior. In its six decades of existence, Israel has violated
virtually every United Nations declaration and flaunted countless
tenets of international legality, most often with the diplomatic,
economic and military protection of the United States. Israel’s
arrogant disregard for the world body reached new heights with the
release of a U.N. report urging Israel to conduct an “independent”
investigation into “war crimes” and “serious violations” of human
rights during its brutal attack on Gaza, last winter.
Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office claimed his government’s own
investigation, which absolved Israel of crimes in the killing of 1,400
Palestinian men, women and children, was “a thousand times more
serious” than that conducted by the U.N. Shimon Peres, Israel’s
president, charged the U.N. with legitimizing “terrorist activity” and
making “a mockery of history” by failing to recognize Israel’s right to
“self-defense.” Other Israelis complained that the U.N. was making a
case for “moral equivalency” between Israel and the Palestinian
resistance.
![]() “How can one make peace with a state that claims the right to adjust its borders according to its own whims?”
On
that count, in a fiendishly perverse sense, Israel is right: there is
no moral equivalency between the Palestinian resistance and Israeli
occupation and aggression. Palestinians have every legal and moral
right to resist being occupied on the West Bank and caged and
quarantined in the world’s biggest jail in Gaza. Israel has no moral or
legal ground to stand on – which is why it chooses to dismiss and
vilify every organ of international legality centered on the United
Nations. Israel is not even a recognizable state, having no borders
that Israel itself recognizes.
The
Israeli state behaves as if its borders are anywhere it may sometime in
the future declare them to be. This borderless state constitutes a
grave threat to every one of its immediate neighbors, and an insult to
hundreds of years of evolving international law. How can one make peace
with a state that claims the right to adjust its borders according to
its own whims? This is an affront to humanity, yet it is the essence of
Israeli foreign and domestic policy.
Underlying
this essential Israeli lawlessness is the concept of a settler state
constructed for the benefit of one ethnic group on land seized from
other peoples. That is the definition of apartheid, and the root of all
of Israel’s constant assaults on international law. It is a barbarism
that must be rejected, boycotted and isolated – not just to relieve the
suffering of Palestinians, but for the sake of human civilization.
|

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
